PCB Stackup Design Considerations for Intel® FPGAs

Download PDF
ID 683883
Date 6/28/2017
Public
Document Table of Contents
Document Table of Contents x
1. PCB Stackup Design Considerations for Intel® FPGAs
1. PCB Stackup Design Considerations for Intel® FPGAs x
1.1. PCB Stackup Construction 1.2. Material Selection 1.3. Glass Transition Temperature 1.4. PCB Stackup Design 1.5. PCB Panelization 1.6. Conclusion 1.7. Specific Recommendations for Intel® FPGA Devices 1.8. References 1.9. Document Revision History
1.2. Material Selection x
1.2.1. Material Loss Considerations
1.2.1. Material Loss Considerations x
1.2.1.1. Relative Dielectric Constant 1.2.1.2. Loss Tangent 1.2.1.3. Fiberglass Weave Composition 1.2.1.4. Skin Effect
1.4. PCB Stackup Design x
1.4.1. Layer Count 1.4.2. Signal Layers 1.4.3. High Speed Signal Layer Planning 1.4.4. Power and Ground Layers 1.4.5. Power Plane and Capacitor Placement Strategy 1.4.6. Planar Capacitance and Spreading Inductance 1.4.7. Plane Layer Separation 1.4.8. Copper Weight 1.4.9. Hybrid Construction
1.4.5. Power Plane and Capacitor Placement Strategy x
1.4.5.1. General Rules for Capacitor and Power Plane Placement 1.4.5.2. Rules for Transceiver Power Plane Placement 1.4.5.3. Rules for High-Current Power Rails 1.4.5.4. Rules for PLL and Other Power Rails
1.7. Specific Recommendations for Intel® FPGA Devices x
1.7.1. Stratix® 10 Device Recommendations 1.7.2. Stratix® V Device Recommendations 1.7.3. Stratix IV Device Recommendations 1.7.4. Arria® 10 Device Recommendations 1.7.5. Arria® V Device Recommendations 1.7.6. Arria II Device Recommendations 1.7.7. Cyclone® 10 Device Recommendations 1.7.8. Cyclone® V Device Recommendations 1.7.9. Cyclone® IV Device Recommendations 1.7.10. Cyclone III Device Recommendations
1.7.1. Stratix® 10 Device Recommendations x
1.7.1.1. Stratix® 10 Device Family Power Plane Placement Example
1.7.2. Stratix® V Device Recommendations x
1.7.2.1. Stratix® V GX, GT, and GS Family Power Plane Placement Example 1.7.2.2. Stratix® V E Family Power Plane Placement Example 1.7.2.3. Stratix® V Transceiver Channel Breakout Recommendations
1.7.3. Stratix IV Device Recommendations x
1.7.3.1. Stratix IV GX and GT Family Power Plane Placement Example 1.7.3.2. Stratix IV E Family Power Plane Placement Example
1.7.4. Arria® 10 Device Recommendations x
1.7.4.1. Arria® 10 Device Family Power Plane Placement Example
1.7.5. Arria® V Device Recommendations x
1.7.5.1. Arria® V Device Family Power Plane Placement Example
1.7.6. Arria II Device Recommendations x
1.7.6.1. Arria II GX Family Power Plane Placement Example
1.7.7. Cyclone® 10 Device Recommendations x
1.7.7.1. Cyclone® 10 LP Device Family Power Plane Placement Example
1.7.8. Cyclone® V Device Recommendations x
1.7.8.1. Cyclone® V Device Family Power Plane Placement Example
1.7.9. Cyclone® IV Device Recommendations x
1.7.9.1. Cyclone® IV GX Family Power Plane Placement Example 1.7.9.2. Cyclone® IV E Family Power Plane Placement Example
1.7.10. Cyclone III Device Recommendations x
1.7.10.1. Cyclone III Family Power Plane Placement Example
1. PCB Stackup Design Considerations for Intel® FPGAs

1.4.5.3. Rules for High-Current Power Rails

Follow these rules for placing the high-current power rails in an Intel® device:
  • High-current power rails result in lower target impedance and present a greater challenge for decoupling. As a general rule, high-current power rails should typically be placed close to the FPGA device to minimize the BGA via inductance. However, depending on whether non-transceiver or transceiver-based devices are used, the priority can be adjusted to optimize the high-current power rail placement:
    • For non-transceiver devices (such as Stratix® V E devices), high-current rails such as core power (VCC) should be placed closest to the FPGA device because there are no sensitive transceiver power rails requiring a higher priority.
      Figure 13. Placement of Core Power in Non-Transceiver Devices
    • For transceiver-based devices (such as Stratix® V GX, GT, or GS devices), high-current rails should receive second priority behind the critical transceiver powers. As second priority, these rails are usually placed on the next available power layer after the critical transceiver power. However, for high-current core power, place the rails furthest from the FPGA device to minimize the capacitor mounting inductance while benefiting from the reduced effective BGA via inductance that result from having an increased number of parallel core power and ground via pairs. Do not share power or ground vias in the BGA breakout, because this negates the benefits of having parallel power and ground vias to reduce the effective BGA via inductance. Furthermore, because some device packages incorporate On-Package-Decoupling (OPD) for core power, placing core power furthest from the FPGA device provides greater flexibility for placement of other high-current rails within the stackup.
Figure 14. Placement of High-Current Rails for Transceiver-Based Devices
Level Two Title