The browser version you are using is not recommended for this site.
Please consider upgrading to the latest version of your browser by clicking one of the following links.

Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family

The Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2600 v3 product family is designed to meet the modern and future needs of compute, storage, and networking, and features accelerated performance with Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (Intel® AVX2) across a broad set of data center workloads, built-in intelligent power management capabilities that improve energy efficiency and frequency optimization, and advanced measurement and telemetry features that maximize operational efficiency through virtualization and data center orchestration. The Intel Xeon processor E5-2600 v3 product family—versatile processors at the heart of today’s data center.

27 two-socket world record performance benchmark results with Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2600 v3 product family-based platforms as of October 21, 2014

All benchmarks for the Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2600 v3 product family can be found in our benchmark library.

Partner Segment – Benchmark Platform Importance
General Computing:
SPECint*_rate_base2006
ASUS RS500-E8* 2-socket world record1

Partner Segment – Benchmark Platform Importance
Server-side Java*:
SPECjbb*2013 – MultiJVM critical-jOPS
Cisco UCS C220 M4* 2-socket world record2
High performance computing:
SPECompG*_base2012
Cisco UCS C220 M4 2-socket world record3
Business processing:
Oracle E-Business Suite* – Large order to cash
Cisco UCS B200 M4 World record (out of all results)4
Business processing:
Oracle E-Business Suite – Extra large payroll
Cisco UCS B200 M4 World record (out of all results)5
Server-side Java:
SPECjbb*2013 – MultiJVM max-jOPS
Cisco UCS C220 M4 2-socket world record6

Partner Segment – Benchmark Platform Importance
Business processing:
SAP Sales & Distribution* (2-Tier) on Linux*
Dell PowerEdge* R730 2-socket world record on Linux*7

Partner Segment – Benchmark Platform Importance
Business processing:
SAP Sales & Distribution* (2-Tier) on Windows*
Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX2540 M1* 2-socket world record on Microsoft Windows*8
Virtualization:
VMmark* 2.5.x
Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX2540 M1 2-socket world record9
General computing:
SPECpower_ssj*2008
Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX2540 M1 World record (out of all results)10
Business Processing:
TPC Benchmark E
Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX2540 M1 2-socket world record11

Partner Segment – Benchmark Platform Importance
Server-side Java*:
SPECjbb*2013 -MulitJMV max-jOPS
HP ProLiant* ML350 Gen9
2-socket world record6
Server-side Java:
SPECjbb2013 -Composite max-jOPs
HP ProLiant ML350 Gen9 World record (out of all results)12
Server-side Java:
SPECjbb2013 -Composite critical-jOPS
HP ProLiant ML350 Gen9 World record (out of all results)13
Server-side Java:
SPECjbb2013 -Distributed max-jOPS
HP ProLiant ML350 Gen9 World record (out of all results)14
Server-side Java:
SPECjbb2013 -Distributed critical-jOPS
HP ProLiant ML350 Gen9 World record (out of all results)15
Virtualization:
SPECvirt*_sc2013
HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 2-socket world record16
Virtualization:
SPECvirt_sc2013_ServerPPW
HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 World record (out of all results)17
Virtualization:
SPECvirt_sc2013_PPW
HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 World record (out of all results)18
Virtualization:
VMmark* 2.5  with Server Power
HP ProLiant DL380 Gen9 World record (out of all results)19
Virtualization:
VMmark 2.5 with Server + Storage Power
HP ProLiant DL380 Gen9 World record (out of all results)20
Business processing:
TPC Benchmark H* @ 1000 GB
HP ProLiant DL380 Gen9 2-socket world record21
General computing:
SPECint_rate_base2006
HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 2-socket world record1
General computing:
SPECfp _base2006
HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 2-socket world record22

Partner Segment – Benchmark Platform Importance
General Computing:
SPECint_rate_base2006
Huawei CH121 v3* 2-socket world record1
General Computing:
SPECint _base2006
Huawei CH121 v3 2-socket world record23

Partner Segment – Benchmark Platform Importance
Business processing:
SAP Sales & Distribution* (2-Tier) on Windows*
IBM System x3650 M5*
2-socket world record on Windows8
General Computing:
SPECfp_rate _base2006
IBM System x3550 M5* 2-socket x86 world record24
General Computing:
SPECint _base2006
IBM System x3550 M5 2-socket world record23

Partner Segment – Benchmark Platform Importance
Workstation:
SPECapc* for Maya* 2012
Lenovo ThinkStation* P900 World record (out of all results)25
Workstation:
SPECapc for 3ds Max* 2015 – CPU Composite
Lenovo ThinkStation P700 2-socket world record26
Workstation:
SPECwpc* 1.0.4 – Financial Services
Lenovo ThinkStation P900 World record (out of all results)27

Additional information: 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

Related Videos

Product and Performance Information

1

Comparison based on two-socket SPECint*_rate_base2006 results published at http://www.spec.org as of October 21, 2014.
New configuration: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9* platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2699 v3, 16x16GB DDR4-2133 DR-RDIMM, Red Hat* Enterprise Linux* (RHEL) 7, Intel Compiler version 14.0.0.080, SPECint_rate_base2006 score: 1360. Source: http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2014q3/cpu2006-20140908-31256.html
New configuration 2: Huawei CH121 v3* platform with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699 v3, 16 x 16 GB DDR4-2133 DR-RDIMM, RHEL 6.5, Intel Compiler version 14.0.0.080, SPECint_rate_base2006 score: 1360. Source: http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2014q3/cpu2006-20140826-31056.html.
New configuration 3: IBM Corporation IBM System x3550 M5* platform with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699 v3, 16 x 16 GB DDR4-2133 DR-RDIMM, RHEL 6.5, Intel Compiler version 14.0.0.080, SPECint_rate_base2006 score: 1360. Source http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2014q4/cpu2006-20140905-31207.html.
New configuration 4: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. ASUS RS500-E8* platform with two Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699 v3, 16 x 16 GB DDR4-2133 DR-RDIMM, RHEL 6.5, Intel Compiler version 14.0.0.080, SPECint_rate_base2006 score: 1360. Source http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2014q4/cpu2006-20140905-31207.html.

2

Comparison based on two-socket SPECjbb2013*-MultiJVM critical-jOPS results published at http://www.spec.org as of August 26, 2014. New configuration: Cisco UCS C220* M4 rack server platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v3, Oracle Java* Standard Edition 8 update 20, 160,283 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS, 58,478 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS. Source: http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/products/collateral/servers-unified-computing/specjbb2013-critical-jops-140825.pdf.

3

Comparison based on two-socket SPECompG*_base2012 results published at http://www.spec.org as of August 26, 2014. New configuration: Cisco UCS C220* M4 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v3 (18 cores), 72 OpenMP* threads, SPECompG_base2012 score: 9.67. Source: http://www.spec.org/omp2012/results/res2014q3/omp2012-20140902-00059.html.

4

Comparison based on Oracle E-Business Suite* R12 (12.1.3)—Large Order-to-Cash results system published at http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/benchmark/apps-benchmark/results-166922.html as of August 26, 2014. New configuration: Cisco UCS* B200 M4 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2697 v3 (14 cores, 28 threads with Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology-enabled, 2.6 GHz, 35 MB L3 cache, 128 GB memory), Oracle Enterprise Linux* 5 update 7 (64-bit), Oracle11g* 11.2.0.3.0 (64-bit), Oracle E-Business Suite R12 (12.1.3), Large Order-to-Cash (batch) score: 243,803 lines/hour. Source: http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/benchmark/e-bus-r12-1-3-o-to-c-ora-lrg-cisco-2283476.pdf.

5

Comparison based on Oracle E-Business Suite* R12 (12.1.3)—Extra-Large Payroll results system published at http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/benchmark/apps-benchmark/results-166922.html as of August 26, 2014. New configuration: Cisco UCS* B200 M4 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2697 v3 (14 cores, 28 threads with Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology enabled, 2.6 GHz, 35 MB L3 cache, 128 GB memory), Oracle Enterprise Linux* 5 update 7 (64-bit), Oracle11g* 11.2.0.3.0 (64-bit), Oracle E-Business Suite R12 (12.1.3), Extra-Large Payroll (batch) score: 1,125,281 employees/hour. Source: http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/benchmark/e-bus-r12-1-3-pay-ora-lrg-cisco-2283480.pdf.

6

Comparison based on two-socket SPECjbb2013*-MultiJVM max-jOPS results published at http://www.spec.org as of October 21, 2014. New configuration: Cisco Systems Cisco UCS C220 M4* platform with two Intel Xeon processor E5-2699 v3, Oracle Java* Standard Edition 8 update 20, 195,119 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS, 51,318 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS. Source http://www.spec.org/jbb2013/results/res2014q4/jbb2013-20140916-00105.html.

7

Comparison based on two-socket SAP SD* (2-Tier) results on Linux* operating system published at http://global.sap.com/solutions/benchmark/sd2tier.epx as of September 11, 2014. New configuration: Dell PowerEdge* R730 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v3 (18 cores, 36 threads), Red Hat* Enterprise Linux* 7, SAP ASE* 16, SAP Enhancement Package 5 for SAP ERP* 6.0, number of SAP SD* benchmark users: 16,500. Source:
http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7C486D5F6CDD0B9C01512C49E26E42EEC4FD802A7DFC839605

8

Comparison based on two-socket SAP SD* (2-Tier) results on Microsoft Windows* operating system published at http://global.sap.com/solutions/benchmark/sd2tier.epx as of September 11, 2014. New configuration 1: Fujitsu PRIMERGY* RX2540 M1 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v3 (18 cores, 36 threads), Microsoft Windows Server* 2012, Microsoft SQL Server* 2012, SAP Enhancement Package* 5 for SAP ERP* 6.0, number of SAP SD* benchmark users: 16,000. Source: http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7CA03078AEB3FBA733A661C187385E8C9941B544F695A8E07D New configuration 2: IBM System x3650* M5 platform with two Intel Xeon processor E5-2699 v3 (18 cores, 36 threads), Microsoft Windows Server 2012 Standard Edition, IBM DB2* 10, SAP enhancement package 5 for SAP ERP 6.0, number of SAP SD benchmark users: 16,000. Source:
http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7C17113863F26106F132FE9F4A8F29D9A784014B1874E842DA

9

Comparison based on two-socket VMmark* 2.5 results published at http://www.vmware.com/a/vmmark/ as of August 26, 2014. New configuration: Fujitsu PRIMERGY* RX2540 M1 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v3, VMware ESXi* 5.5.0 U2, VMmark v2.5.2 score: 26.48 at 22 tiles. Source: http://www.vmware.com/a/assets/vmmark/pdf/2014-09-08-Fujitsu-RX2540M1.pdf.

10

Comparison based on all SPECpower_ssj2008* results published at http://www.spec.org as of October 21, 2014. New configuration: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX2540 M1* platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v3, 8 x 8 GB DDR4-2133 DR-RDIMM, Microsoft Windows Server* 2008 R2 Enterprise SP1, IBM J9* VM, 10,654 overall ssj_ops/watt. Source: http://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008/results/res2014q4/power_ssj2008-20140930-00675.html.

11

Comparison based on 2-socket TPC-E* results published at http://www.tpc.org/ as of August 26, 2014. Fujitsu PRIMERGY* RX2540 M1 platform with two Intel® Xeon®  E5-2699 v3, TPC-E throughput: 3,772.08 tpsE. Source: http://www.tpc.org/tpce/results/tpce_result_detail.asp?id=114100601http://www.tpc.org/4070 as of October 21, 2014.

12

Comparison based on SPECjbb2013*-Composite results published at http://www.spec.org as of August 26, 2014. New configuration: HP ProLiant* ML350 Gen9 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v3, Oracle Java* Standard Edition 8 update 11, 137,713 SPECjbb2013-Composite max-jOPS, 62,869 SPECjbb2013-Composite critical-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2013/results/res2014q3/jbb2013-20140902-00099.html.

13

Comparison based on SPECjbb2013*-Composite results published at http://www.spec.org as of August 26, 2014. New configuration: HP ProLiant* ML350 Gen9 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v3, Oracle Java* Standard Edition 8 update 11, 116,909 SPECjbb2013-Composite max-jOPS, 76,475 SPECjbb2013-Composite critical-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2013/results/res2014q3/jbb2013-20140902-00098.html.

14

Comparison based on two-socket SPECjbb2013*-Distributed max-jOPS results published at http://www.spec.org as of August 26, 2014. New configuration: HP ProLiant* ML350 Gen9 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v3, Oracle Java* Standard Edition 8 update 11, 187,501 SPECjbb2013-Distributed max-jOPS, 47,420 SPECjbb2013-Distributed critical-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2013/results/res2014q3/jbb2013-20140902-00100.html.

15

Comparison based on two-socket SPECjbb2013*-Distributed critical-jOPS results published at http://www.spec.org as of August 26, 2014. New configuration: HP ProLiant* ML350 Gen9 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v3, Oracle Java* Standard Edition 8 update 11, 187,501 SPECjbb2013-Distributed max-jOPS, 47,420 SPECjbb2013-Distributed critical-jOPS. Source: http://www.spec.org/jbb2013/results/res2014q3/jbb2013-20140902-00100.html.

16

Comparison based on two-socket SPECvirt*_sc2013 results published at http://www.spec.org as of August 26, 2014. New configuration: HP ProLiant* DL360 Gen9 with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v3, SPECvirt_sc2013 1614 at 95 virtual machines (VMs). Source: http://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/res2014q3/virt_sc2013-20140819-00017-perf.html.

17

Comparison based on all SPECvirt*_sc2013_ServerPPW results published at http://www.spec.org as of August 26, 2014. New configuration: HP ProLiant* DL360 Gen9 with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v3, SPECvirt_sc2013_ServerPPW 2.437 @ 95 VMs. Source: http://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/res2014q3/virt_sc2013-20140819-00017-ppws.html.

18

Comparison based on all SPECvirt*_sc2013_PPW results published at http://www.spec.org as of August 26, 2014. New configuration: HP ProLiant* DL360 Gen9 with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v3, SPECvirt_sc2013_PPW 1.615 at 95 virtual machines (VMs). Source: http://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/results/res2014q3/virt_sc2013-20140819-00017-ppw.html.

19

Comparison based on two-socket VMmark* 2.5 Performance with Server Power results published at http://www.vmware.com/a/vmmark/ as of August 26, 2014. New configuration: HP ProLiant* DL380 Gen9 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v3, VMware ESXi* 5.5.0 U2, VMmark V2.5 PPKW score: 17.6899 at 20 tiles. Source: http://www.vmware.com/a/assets/vmmark/pdf/2014-09-08-HP-ProLiantDL380G9-serverptd.pdf.

20

Comparison based on two-socket VMmark* 2.5 Performance with Server and Storage Power results published at http://www.vmware.com/a/vmmark/ as of August 26, 2014. New configuration: HP ProLiant* DL380 Gen9 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v3, VMware* ESXi 5.5.0 U2, VMmark V2.5 PPKW score = 12.7058 @ 20 tiles. Source: http://www.vmware.com/a/assets/vmmark/pdf/2014-09-08-HP-ProLiantDL380G9-allptd.pdf.

21

Comparison based on two-socket TPC Benchmark H* @ 1000 GB results published at http://www.tpc.org as of August 26, 2014. New configuration: HP ProLiant* DL380 Gen9 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2699 v3, TPC-H performance: 390,590 QphH @ 1000 GB. Source: http://www.tpc.org/3303.

22

Comparison based on two-socket SPECfp*_base2006 results published at http://www.spec.org as of October 21, 2014 New configuration:  Hewlett-Packard Company ProLiant DL360 Gen9* platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2667 v3, 16 x 16 GB DDR4-2133 DR-RDIMM, Red Hat* Enterprise Linux* (RHEL) 7.0, Intel Compiler version 15.0.0.090 SPECfp_base2006 score: 115. Source: http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2014q4/cpu2006-20140923-31816.html.

23

Comparison based on two-socket SPECint*_base2006 results published at http://www.spec.org as of September 25, 2014. New configuration: Huawei CH121 v3* platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2643 v3, 16x 16 GB DDR4-2133 DR-RDIMM, Red Hat* Enterprise Linux* (RHEL) 6.5, Intel® Compiler version 14.0.0.080, SPECint_base2006 score: 63.7. Source: http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2014q3/cpu2006-20140826-31052.html.

24

Comparison based on two-socket SPECfp*_rate_base2006 results published at http://www.spec.org as of October 21, 2014 New configuration: IBM Corporation IBM System x3550 M5* platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2699 v3, 16 x 16 GB DDR4-2133 DR-RDIMM, Red Hat* Enterprise Linux* (RHEL) 6.5, Intel Compiler version 15.0.0.090, SPECfp_rate_base2006 score: 916. Source: http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2014q4/cpu2006-20140908-31220.html.

25

Comparison based on SPECapc* for Maya* 2012 benchmark results published at http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/benchmark/apps-benchmark/results-166922.html as of August 26, 2014. New configuration: Lenovo ThinkStation* P900 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2687W v3, NVIDIA Quadro* K6000, graphics score: 4.95, CPU score: 4.06. Source: http://www.lenovo.com.

26

Comparison based on SPECapc* for 3ds Max 2015* benchmark results published at http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/benchmark/apps-benchmark/results-166922.html as of August 26, 2014. New configuration: Lenovo ThinkStation* P700 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2690 v3, NVIDIA Quadro* K5200, scores: CPU composite: 6.79, GPU composite: 4.14, large model composite: 3.67. Source: http://www.lenovo.com.

27

Comparison based on SPECwpc* v1.0-Financial Services benchmark results published at http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/benchmark/apps-benchmark/results-166922.html as of August 26, 2014. New configuration: Lenovo ThinkStation* P900 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2687W v3, NVIDIA Quadro* K6000, SPECwpc* v1.0-Financial Services composite score: 9.76. Source: http://www.lenovo.com.

28

Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel® microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations, and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information, go to www.intel.com/benchmarks.

29

Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase.

30

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology: See the Processor Spec Finder at http://ark.intel.com or contact your Intel representative for more information.

31

Requires a system with Intel® Turbo Boost Technology. Intel® Turbo Boost Technology and Intel® Turbo Boost Technology 2.0 are only available on select Intel® processors. Consult your PC manufacturer. Performance varies depending on hardware, software, and system configuration. For more information, visit www.intel.com/content/www/xa/en/architecture-and-technology/turbo-boost/turbo-boost-technology.html.

32

Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology (Intel® HT Technology) requires a computer system with a processor supporting Intel HT Technology and an Intel HT Technology-enabled chipset, BIOS, and operating system. Performance will vary depending on the specific hardware and software used. For more information including details on which processors support Intel HT Technology, visit www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/hyper-threading/hyper-threading-technology.html.

33

Intel® processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. See http://www.intel.sg/content/www/xa/en/processors/processor-numbers.html for details.

34

Comparison based on two-socket SPECmpiM*_base2007 results published at http://www.spec.org as of September 25, 2014. New configuration: Endeavor with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2697 v3 (14 cores), 28 MPI ranks, Intel® Compiler version 14.0.3.174, SPECmpiM_base2007 score: 7.85. Source: http://www.spec.org/mpi2007/results/res2014q3/mpi2007-20140902-00471.html.